Welcome to Ocean Watch; a weekly recap of federal and regional
actions that impact the coastal and marine water quality and ecosystems of the
Mid-Atlantic Ocean. Clean Ocean Action will aggregate and analyze these
actions, and signify the impact and threat level to the Mid-Atlantic using
color coding – Red is a high level threat, orange is intermediate, yellow is a
caution, and green would be a positive action. While many of these actions have
taken place in Washington DC, and don’t affect the mid-Atlantic directly, the
direction of national energy, climate, and regulatory policy will have
implications and impacts for the mid-Atlantic region.
Mid-Atlantic Ocean Watch – Week 4
Nominations
Continue
On Friday, the Senate confirmed Scott Pruitt to run the EPA, putting a career fossil fuel subsidized, EPA suing, deregulating, climate skeptic in charge of the federal agency tasked with protecting the environment and human health. It is clear that this nomination puts the Trump Administration one step closer to dismantling major regulations on climate change and clean water, and to cut the size, scope, and funding of EPA; funding that supports everything from Superfund Cleanup to Water Quality testing. In our corner of the world, these two funding cuts will be felt most acutely. The climate impacts will be felt world wide, and for decades to come.
Senators voted 52 to 46 to confirm Mr. Pruitt. One Republican, Susan Collins of Maine, crossed party lines to vote against Mr. Pruitt, while two Democrats, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, both from coal-rich states where voters generally oppose environmental rules, voted for him. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/17/us/politics/live-congress-votes-scott-pruitt-epa.html
On Friday, the Senate confirmed Scott Pruitt to run the EPA, putting a career fossil fuel subsidized, EPA suing, deregulating, climate skeptic in charge of the federal agency tasked with protecting the environment and human health. It is clear that this nomination puts the Trump Administration one step closer to dismantling major regulations on climate change and clean water, and to cut the size, scope, and funding of EPA; funding that supports everything from Superfund Cleanup to Water Quality testing. In our corner of the world, these two funding cuts will be felt most acutely. The climate impacts will be felt world wide, and for decades to come.
Senators voted 52 to 46 to confirm Mr. Pruitt. One Republican, Susan Collins of Maine, crossed party lines to vote against Mr. Pruitt, while two Democrats, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, both from coal-rich states where voters generally oppose environmental rules, voted for him. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/17/us/politics/live-congress-votes-scott-pruitt-epa.html
While the nomination of Pruitt to EPA administrator is a major blow to all those who care about clean water and climate change mitigation, there is still time to contact your elected officials and make it absolutely clear that clean water and a stable climate are not negotiable.
The last environmentally related cabinet positions awaiting approval are Department of Energy and Department of Interior. We will update as the process moves forward...
Congressional
Repeal of Obama Administration’s Regulations Finalized
On Tuesday, President Trump signed the first successful use of the
Congressional Review Act since 2001 into law. The resolution (H.J. Res. 41) nullifies a Security and Exchange Commission
rule requiring oil, gas and mining companies to disclose payments to foreign
governments and bar the agency from issuing a "substantially similar"
version in the future. According to the Center for American Progress using data
from Maplight.org “oil and gas industry opponents of the rule have donated
$2,321,165 to the members of Congress who sponsored the resolution to repeal
the rule. Leading the charge against the rule is Exxon Mobil, who was led by
then-CEO and current Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. The company has fought
this rule from the outset and has been investigated on more
than one occasion for dubious financial payments to secure
access to oil in foreign countries. Exxon Mobil has challenged these claims and
argues that the company follows American anti-bribery and anti-corruption law
when operating abroad.”
Keeping
an Eye on Zombie Projects
With the Trump Administration’s emphasis on fossil fuel extraction
and infrastructure development, several large fossil fuel projects that were
thought to be dead have been recently revived. These include the high profile
Dakota Access natural gas pipeline, as well as the lesser known Jordan Cove LNG
terminal and pipeline project in Oregon. The Jordan Cove revival in particular
is worrisome news for those of us in the mid-Atlantic who fought for nearly a
decade to prevent a liquefied natural gas port from being built off of our
coasts, as it raises the specter of a zombie project being pursued yet again in
our waters. We will continue to monitor for old and new harmful industrial
projects in the mid-Atlantic, with the knowledge that in a Trump presidency, it
is more likely that they could return…
The Senate Targets the Endangered Species Act
A Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing led
by Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) unfolded Wednesday with round after round of
criticism from Republican lawmakers who said the federal effort to keep species
from going extinct encroaches on states’ rights, is unfair to landowners and
stymies efforts by mining companies to extract resources and create jobs. At
least one Republican has vowed to wage an effort to repeal the Endangered
Species Act. The Endangered Species Act
is a critical piece of legislation that protects plants and animal species, as
well as the areas they need to survive. Furthermore, this piece of legislation
can be viewed as the “canary in the coal mine” of environmental regulations –
if this Law is allowed to be repealed, weakened, or eviscerated, there is no
telling which critical Environmental Regulation is next.
New York State Block's NYC's Bag Fee
The problem of single use plastics and their harmful impact
on our waterways and oceans is well known. Many diverse environmental and
governmental entities, including COA, are working on different strategies to
reduce or eliminate single use plastics from our everyday lives. New York
City lawmakers investigated the issue of plastics pollution management for two
years, and introduced a plastic bag fee legislation in 2016. This NYC
plastic bag fee law required retailers to charge an additional 5 cents for every
plastic bag, and was to go into effect on Feb 15, 2017. Critically, the
fee would have gone back to the merchants – this is a very important point that
we will get back to.
In a significant setback, NY state Gov. Andrew Cuomo on
Tuesday signed a bill into law which postpones all city led bag fees until at
least 2018. COA advocates for the reduction and elimination of single use
plastics through well-designed policies and programs, wherein any fee collected
would go towards the management of these wastes, and not back to the merchants.
This approach has worked extremely well in many cities, such as Washington D.C.
Regardless of the structure of the fee, it is disappointing that
regulations to reduce the use of single use plastic bags in New York city have
been delayed once again. Hopefully Governor Cuomo’s promised “statewide task force to develop a uniform state plan
for addressing the plastic bag problem” will result in rapid and concrete
action on this issue. Note that in New Jersey, bills to impose a nickel-fee on
single use plastic bags have stalled in Trenton after being introduced last
spring. Call your Governor and State elected officials and tell them you
support laws that will discourage the use of single use plastic!
US
Army Corps of Engineers Beneficially Reuses Dredge Material
The US Army Corps of Engineers
New York District announced the details of a navigational dredging project for
the Sandy Hook Channel – a major artery for shipping and recreational boating.
What makes this project so unique is that the sand and gravel excavated from
the channel will be placed at the Sea Bright Borrow Area – the main source of
beach nourishment sand for Northern coastal New Jersey. COA has been advocating
for many years for the placement of material from these types of locations back
to the borrow area to spare other natural sand formations from harvest, and
beneficially use the dredge material from the channel. This is an example of a
win-win – for navigation, for coastal communities, and for marine life that live
on these natural lumps. The goal is that the replenishment of these borrow
areas will alleviate some of the need for harvesting from untouched areas.
There are other areas in New Jersey that can make this work, including major
inlets and other areas of sand accretion. We are working to identify these
locations, and the borrow areas close to them that have been used in the past
so that the USACE can then dredge them for navigation and place that material
in the borrow area for storage. While not a blanket solution, this type of
project can at least minimize the impact of nourishment activities by
alleviating the need for borrowing from new areas while providing for
navigation and coastal protection. A final note: we recognize that this
material is not going out to the HARS site for remediation (for capping the
contaminated area) as it has been placed there in the past, however COA
believes that at this point in time, that material can be used to greater
effect by being “stored” at the Sea Bright borrow area for further beach
nourishment placement. This does not mean HARS is remediated and no longer
needs clean sand, it does and we keep a close and watchful eye on any placement
out there. http://www.nan.usace.army.mil/Portals/37/docs/regulatory/special_publicnotices/2017/PublicNoticeSandyHook2017.pdf
YOUR VOICE IS NEEDED!
· It is vital that every citizen engage with their elected officials. In this day and age
of instant communication, there is no excuse for not contacting your elected
officials. Use the links below to find your representatives and let them know
how important clean water and strong environmental protections are to you:
o
Federal:
§
Call your US
Senators: https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
§
Call your US
House of Representative: http://www.house.gov/representatives/
o
State Level:
§
Contact your
Governor: https://www.usa.gov/state-governor
§
For NJ residents,
contact your State Senate and Assembly Representatives: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/districts/njmap210.html
§
For NY residents,
contact your State Senate and Assembly Representatives: http://www.elections.ny.gov/district-map/district-map.html
No comments:
Post a Comment